From the story of dragon fruit, looking at Thai agriculture

download 1

TTO – As a country with a developed agricultural sector, Thailand has also gone through challenging and worrying periods. However, their greatest strength lies in having the right philosophy for farming.

Từ câu chuyện thanh long, nhìn sang nông nghiệp Thái - Ảnh 1.

A woman selling fruit at the Damnoen Saduak floating market near Bangkok – Photo: livingnomads

For Thailand, the 1997 financial crisis was a costly lesson in unbalanced and unsustainable growth. One of the reasons stemmed from an unsuitable course of economic and social development, in which the economy relied too heavily on foreign capital and external markets.

The production sector, including agriculture, was mainly export-oriented to earn foreign currency. As a result, farmers in some areas had to buy rice to eat even though they grew it themselves. The crisis hit when production expanded but there were no buyers.

“Sufficiency Economy”

Since 1973, on many occasions when addressing his people, the late King Bhumibol Adulyadej of Thailand emphasized a development orientation based on sufficiency, moderation, frugality, rationalization, and the creation of “social immunity” for the majority of people engaged in agriculture.

The King warned Thais not to live carelessly, and even in making money, development must follow sound theories and always remain within moral boundaries. This philosophy became known as the Sufficiency Economy.

When the country went through the 1997 financial crisis, the King reminded his subjects of the need for self-reliance. In his birthday speech on December 4, 1997, he explained:

“Recently, many projects have been implemented, many factories have been built, and people thought Thailand would become a small tiger, then a big tiger. Everyone was excited about becoming a tiger… Being a tiger is not important; what matters to us is having a sufficiency economy. A sufficiency economy means having enough to support ourselves…”

The “Sufficiency Economy” is not a theory about how a national economy operates, but rather a guiding principle for making sound decisions beneficial to development, according to the National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB) – the government agency mainly responsible for its implementation.

Từ câu chuyện thanh long, nhìn sang nông nghiệp Thái - Ảnh 2.

King Bhumibol Adulyadej guiding Thai farmers in cultivation and irrigation – archival photo

The King’s Vision

Thailand is located in a region rich in biodiversity, with fertile land capable of producing many food crops. For thousands of years, the Thai people have lived by farming, thriving thanks to the abundance of fertile soil, the sea, and rivers.

The late King Bhumibol understood this very well. He consistently emphasized the absolute importance of land and water—two essential factors in agricultural development. It is no coincidence that around 2,000 water resource development projects were initiated by the Thai Royal Family across the country.

From his very first field trip after ascending the throne, King Bhumibol met directly with farmers, inquired about their living conditions, inspected maps he had drawn himself, took photographs, and recorded everything worth remembering. The Thai saying, “There is no place in this country where the King’s footsteps have not been left” originates from this very fact.

Từ câu chuyện thanh long, nhìn sang nông nghiệp Thái - Ảnh 3.

Not only a leader, King Bhumibol Adulyadej was also an inventor. He held numerous patents for innovations that supported farmers, among which the most notable was his artificial rainmaking technique – archival photo.

Understanding the hardships faced by farmers, particularly the shortage of water during the dry season, King Bhumibol conceived the “New Theory” of agriculture based on the “Sufficiency Economy” philosophy.

He divided an average family’s 15 rai (24,000 m²) of farmland into a 30:30:30:10 ratio:

  • 30% for digging a reservoir large enough to provide water for one year (taking drought into account) while also enabling aquaculture,

  • 30% for growing rice,

  • 30% for planting fruit trees, vegetables, and seasonal crops, and

  • 10% for other activities.

In essence, the “New Theory” is a method for managing land and water resources for small farms under natural conditions, both in normal times and during crises. It is outlined step by step so farmers can implement it themselves.

In 2007, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) issued a statement recognizing King Bhumibol’s rural development work. The report, titled “King Bhumibol: Sowing the Seeds of a Better Future for Farmers”, praised how, under his leadership, Thailand had effectively transformed from a poor agrarian society into a leading middle-income country within ASEAN.

Thai-Style Agricultural Management

King Bhumibol’s “New Theory” consists of three phases:

  1. Phase One: Farmers aim to produce enough food for their families, live in a clean and unpolluted environment, and maintain good health. This is achieved by following the 30:30:30:10 land division model.

  2. Phase Two: Farmers are encouraged to form groups or cooperatives to collaborate with government agencies, private companies, and investment funds in various areas—for example, in seed production and soil improvement; in providing storage facilities, drying yards, distribution, and milling; in processing, such as making shrimp paste, fish sauce, or dried foods; in welfare, such as healthcare and loans; in education, such as schools and scholarships; and in other social, religious, and community matters.

    By joining forces, farmers can reduce reliance on external groups, increase their bargaining power in selling products, cut costs in transportation and marketing, and plan production for mutual benefit.

  3. Phase Three: This involves connecting with other agencies and organizations in finance, marketing, and energy to expand commercial activities—for instance, establishing rice mills, community shops, or service stations. Farmers can gain more opportunities for learning and experience in production, agricultural processing, marketing, and even exporting.

Through this approach, farming families can earn higher incomes, live happier lives, and foster stronger community bonds. When followed step by step, it represents a form of sustainable development.

.
           .
           .